Unifying MANTRA: Your Thoughts on Ticker Change + Token Split

As mentioned in a recent Community Connect by our CEO JP Mullin, we are planning to initiate the next steps in line with our strategy to consolidate the $OM token around our native ecosystem and the MANTRA brand. Before we launch a proposal for voting, we want to share our plan with the community, and seek valuable input and feedback. The plan is to engage in an active community discussion so that we can include your feedback and suggestions.

We invite all Sherpas to participate and share their thoughts - as we believe these next steps affect us all equally.

Disclaimer: Please note that the following text is a draft proposal subject to change based on community inputs as well as further thorough technical analysis happening simultaneously.

Proposal Summary:

In preparation for OM coming home to its native chain, we intend to further consolidate our ecosystem around our brand and to streamline our tokenomics in a way that is primed for global expansion. We believe MANTRA is our strongest brand, and we want to double down on this. As such, we believe the following proposal lays the best foundation for the first steps after the deprecation of ERC20 OM.

The steps we propose are the following:

  1. Change the ticker from $OM to $MANTRA

  2. Implement a 1:4 token split, which proportionally adjusts the hard capped max supply from 2.5B to 10B

Reasons for this Proposal:

  1. Change the ticker from $OM to $MANTRA

With OM on its way home to MANTRA Chain, we’re ready for the next phase: complete brand harmonization. By updating our ticker to align with our ecosystem name as $MANTRA, we create instant global recognition where our coin, chain, and entire suite of products speak with one unified voice. This change creates clarity as we grow. By ensuring our ticker matches our brand we further strengthen our identity as we continue to build the future of RWA infrastructure.

This upgrade will mark the final step in our evolution, with a complete product suite ranging from MANTRA Chain to MANTRA Finance, MANTRA Zone, mantraUSD, and now $MANTRA.

  1. Complete a 1:4 token split corresponding with the max supply from 2.5B to 10B

In an effort to streamline our tokenomics, we propose to increase the max supply from 2.5B (as per the latest proposal) to 10B, in combination with a 1:4 ratio token split. This allows existing as well as new sherpas, investors, and institutions to more easily understand key metrics such as the FDV and their individual positions. It will also align $MANTRA’s tokenomics with prominent projects such as $SUI, $ONDO, $ARB, $ALGO, $SEI, $XPL - who have set an industry standard with a 10B max supply. Upon approval, this new max supply will be codified into the protocol layer itself, meaning that it will be final, and will reflect as such on data aggregator platforms such as Coingecko and CoinMarketCap. Most importantly, by combining this increase in max supply with the proposed token split, all important token metrics remain the same. It is important to note that this 1:4 token split represents ZERO DILUTION of the token supply.

What is a token split? A token split is the direct equivalent of a stock split in traditional equity markets. The total supply of tokens is increased by a specific ratio, while the price per token is simultaneously decreased by the same ratio.

The key principle is that the total market value (market capitalization) of any holder’s stake remains unchanged immediately after the split. Below we have outlined the key metrics and how they would be affected by this proposal.

The effects of the token split for OM Holders:

The token split and ticker change are planned to be facilitated through a chain upgrade, with the primary goal of requiring minimal to no additional steps for most users. We understand that the deprecation of ERC20 OM already requires several steps from our Sherpa community, which is why we’re designing this proposal’s execution to be as frictionless as possible for current $OM holders.

Based on our current engineering approach, the chain upgrade would automatically update $OM balances in user wallets to new $MANTRA balances, creating a seamless transition for the majority of holders. While some edge cases (such as OM locked in smart contracts) may require user action, our engineering team continues their R&D efforts to minimize these scenarios.

The table below outlines our preliminary assessment of user actions that may be needed for different positions. As our engineering team continues their R&D, these requirements may be simplified further:

Note: If you still hold OM on Ethereum, Polygon or BNB, you need to bridge to MANTRA Chain before January 15th 2026 as outlined in the previous Proposal.

Additional Notes:

  • The above table covers the most common positions where OM is currently held, representing the majority of circulating supply. However, this is not an exhaustive list, and there may be additional edge cases or positions we continue to identify.

  • For futures positions on $OM markets, specific instructions will need to be provided by the respective exchanges where these positions are being traded.

  • Should we uncover additional scenarios or receive specific community feedback, we will update this table and provide guidance for any newly identified positions.

Our collective vision is what makes this ecosystem strong. Now, we turn to you to help refine this plan and ensure it reflects the will of the community. We’re listening, share your thoughts below and let’s shape the future of MANTRA together.

8 Likes

$MANTRA ticker is clean :+1:

i like the addition of a supply hard cap too, should increase investor trust

the term ‘token split’ scares some ppl, but here there is no dilution so im in favour

8 Likes

:100::om::clap::100::om::clap::100::om::clap::100::om::clap:

8 Likes

Thank y’all for doubling down on Mantra.

First of All i wanted to say I am very happy with the planned Split. This could Kickstart value accural if done right. And you have my full trust on this.

Is there any safety Mechanism planned to prevent high volatility during the Split period? As like to Pause the market for a predetermined time or something like that? Maybe a Screenshot of the wallets? Just a genuine question if you thought about how to do it most convenient and efficient.

And for the fact that no normal holder has to do anything: that’s damn cool :grin: will it likely be a Kind of an airdrop or does $MANTRA just replace $OM?

Thanks for reading and Id be happy to read your answers. Same for other holders question or opinions

7 Likes

How will stacking continue?

3 Likes

$MANTRA fits the ecosystem much better & gives the brand more consistency. I have always favored that - https://x.com/SuperEra_Sa/status/1975638761150300237
So, voting YES for $MANTRA :white_check_mark:

And 1:4 split also makes sense for long-term positioning, especially now that many projects are starting to go mainnet on Mantra EVM chain.

Best of Luck & will be around to read thought by other members too

4 Likes

The name ‘Mantra’ seems perfect, aligning with the ecosystem. :100: support and agree with the change from ‘Om’ to ‘Mantra’.

As respects 1:4 split, although I understand it’s non-dilutive, am unsure how it would pan out from the overall tokennomics perspective. Ie: the availability of coins that are currently not in circulation will go up 4X, which in itself could water down the value of Mantra token in coming future. Would appreciate any thoughts/clarification on this.

Also, what would be the emission schedule of the remaining ‘Mantra’ coins. Thanks

4 Likes

Staking is not affected. As shown in the proposal above, there is no action required from the staker

3 Likes

Tokenomics do not change. And the emissions stay the same. Marketcap stays the same at the time of the split. Token price is cut 1/4, so someone can purchase 4x the amount of $MANTRA as they could before the split. Main thing is, nothing changes as far as Marketcap, emissions, and tokenomics structure

5 Likes

Rewards apy stay the same?

2 Likes

The only thing that would change the APR is an inflation change, which would need a governance proposal. Of course the APR is dependant upon the number of coins staked. The more that stake, the lower the APR as the reward pool is diluted.

4 Likes

i agree the the fact that theres no dilution is big. so i see it as a rebrand.

3 Likes

my thoughts:

purely in terms of creative ticker choice i did like $OM because of all the wordplay that was possible lol. but we can’t go wrong with $MANTRA. even though its the full name it is still quicker to say than $BNB or $XRP, and has unmistakable brand identity obviously.

i understand the decision to change ticker was taken with a lot of intricate knowledge about the network they are operating in, with exchanges and other big players etc. I simply don’t have all this knowledge nor is it appropiate for me to have. but it seems like there was significant baggage they saw the opportunity to shed by making these changes.

So i support the decision to go $MANTRA !

6 Likes

no dilution, no substantive changes to the value of our tokens, 10B max supply matching new industry standard, doubling down on $MANTRA.

100% in favour lets go

4 Likes

I’ve already shared my thoughts on Twitter, and I believe many have seen them, so I won’t repeat them here. I just hope this new beginning sparks rebounds in multiple areas and leads to a swift recovery in value.

5 Likes

I feel Rebranding as Mantra is good move but distrusting/ Spliting the token will create more confusion and price will look like dropped further to almost $.03 which demoralize pulic sentiment about this token.

Hi team Mantra, thank you for all the effort and keep pushing Mantra forward and upwards no matter what happens in the market!

The ticker change and token splits, I think it is a good move and make whole sense.

The brand unification makes our message more coherent and focused around the Mantra umbrella through the whole ecosystem which is highly positive, imo.

The Token split, as it keeps everything proportional, including incentives, theoretically there is no change in fundamental value but it might even be a positive move as it increases liquidity on the margin with tighter bid and ask spreads which will be important as the token appreciates in price.
So, I am very supportive of the initiative and congrats again for the team for the restless work!

LFG!!

4 Likes

possibly a risk short term

team comms have been pretty clear so far tho

optics of a 10b supply are much cleaner than 888,888,888…..like if a rich Arab wants to buy 1% just let him do it without a maths headache lol

4 Likes

Make sure to also take into account $OM which is in various vesting contracts, like the gendrop, the OM upgrade program, OMies, etc.

2 Likes

1:4可以理解 但是有没有通缩机制?没有通缩机制这个项目只会逐渐被抛弃